Justia – a comprehensive resource for federal and state statutory laws, as well as case regulation at both the federal and state levels.
The main objectives of police should be to apprehend offenders, examine crimes, and prosecute them before the cours also to prevent to commission of crime, and earlier mentioned all make certain regulation and order to protect citizen???s life and property. Read more
Given that the Supreme Court will be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision is arrived at, therefore the decision of the Supreme Court needs for being taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) from the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
If your employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC may dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not had a chance to answer the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In certain cases, the NIRC might allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this is generally only accomplished In case the employee can show that that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. From the present case, the parties were allowed to guide evidence and the petitioner company responded into the allegations as a result they were properly aware of the allegations and led the evidence therefore this point is ofno use to generally be looked into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Read more
thirteen . Const. P. 209/2025 (S.B.) Saifullah Jamali (Disable) V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi After arguing the matter at some length, both parties have agreed into the disposal of the instant petition within the premise that the DIGP Malir will listen to the petitioner in addition to private respondents and will acquire care of each of the areas of the case and be certain that no harassment shall be caused to both the parties.
Only a few years ago, searching for case precedent was a challenging and time consuming activity, necessitating men and women to search through print copies of case legislation, or to purchase access to commercial online databases. Today, the internet has opened up a number of case law search choices, and lots of sources offer free access to case law.
All executive and judicial authorities throughout Pakistan are obligated to act in support in the Supreme Court, ensuring the enforcement of its judgments. As being the Supreme Court will be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has actually been reached, the decision with the Supreme Court needs to get taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) on the Constitution. Read more
In federal or multi-jurisdictional law systems there may possibly exist conflicts between the various decrease appellate courts. Sometimes these differences will not be resolved, and it may be necessary to distinguish how the legislation is applied in a single district, province, division or appellate department.
In certain jurisdictions, case legislation is often applied to ongoing adjudication; for example, criminal proceedings or family regulation.
This Court may perhaps interfere where the more info authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer inside of a method inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the mode of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding reached via the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If the summary or finding is for instance no reasonable person would have ever achieved, the Court may interfere with the summary or maybe the finding and mould the relief to really make it acceptable on the facts of each case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority is the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-appreciate the evidence or maybe the nature of punishment. Within the aforesaid proposition, we have been fortified through the decision from the Supreme Court from the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 337 Order Date: 24-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Performing a case law search may be as easy as entering specific keywords or citation into a search engine. There are, however, certain websites that facilitate case legislation searches, which includes:
The different roles of case law in civil and common law traditions create differences in the way that courts render decisions. Common regulation courts generally explain in detail the legal rationale at the rear of their decisions, with citations of both legislation and previous relevant judgments, and often interpret the broader legal principles.
We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy on the information contained on this site, or the information linked to to the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before depending on it for legal research purposes.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming for the main case, It is additionally a very well-established proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence inside the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty with the charge, however, that is matter on the procedure provided under the relevant rules rather than otherwise, for that reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-recognize the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings about the evidence.